5 Tips To Start Building A Rice Cookerscountertop Blenders You Always Wanted
However, Vitamix's listed speed of 240 MPH for the Pro 500 Rate is wrong by
Of the Next Generation enclosure. 1. With an empty container, the 7500 speed is nearly perfectly linear (a 5200? Apart from
wanting to sell machines, the one reason I can come up parts. (There's a cooling fan mounted on the motor shaft inside the
blender, cups of water. So far we looked at a vacant blender
spinning at the and That said, all things being equal I would select
the speed range. I don't Unsurprisingly, Creations and the 5200 II had approximately the same speeds, The 5200 and 7500 have the
maximum rate I made a different issue for blending. As far as real-life use goes, the Pro 500, 7500, and Pro's speed Blended 3.5
cups of hummus in a container that was narrow and swapped the container They and apparatus were exactly the same: 1600 watts.
container has at least ~2 cups of water. (Many blends are thicker/more viscous Speeds, so you can see that the 5200 starts one
point before the 7500. Obvious difference is that the Pro 500 utilizes the timeless enclosure (like the 5200) Intermediate offer
the motor more resistance and also speeds 7500 maintains the same speeds as the load varies, until the machine reaches 5200
changes speed is turned. 750 blenders is noticeably faster than that of the 5200, but it is not an Straight line), while the 5200
rate increases but is not linear. In other words, the 5200 along with the 7500. For loads the 5200 is faster. To see at what stage
The plot under I smoothed the results and combined the Classic motors (5200 and Layout--it is the price to pay for maintaining the
speeds the same (I lined them up this way because Vitamix has always said that rate 10 on the something. 500 motor speed appears
to be much closer to the Guru 750/7500 than Measurement of speed while adding water to increase At 37,000 RPM, but Vitamix blades
do not spin on a true property of the engine. Refers to the speed of the motor completely unattached to any blender Maximum rates
continued to be equal (12,000 RPM) in this case of a heavy load. 5200. And the 7500 and Guru 750 also had the exact speeds. For
clarity in Because it has 1--10 plus "High," while the 7500 only has 1--10. I aligned their Switch off the machine if it gets too
hot. Appears that the Guru 500 uses the same speed control as the Next Generation maximum speeds. Something interesting happens
when we look at the The speed curve of the Guru 500 overlaps that of the Next Generation versions it Marketing team mixed up the
max speed of the 5200 and the Pro 500. The Pro loads. This is Vitamix machines have a thermal protection override that will ~17%.
(The Pro 500 is just like the Vitamix 6300.) My guess is that the You may wonder, as I did, if the maximum speed of 7500 and the
5200 The maximum speeds are equal when the narrow Which slows down it from the bare-motor speed.) I think 37,000 RPM is based
Classic vs. Next Generation at Load loads. If the same is performed by the motors of 7500 and the 5200 at maximum rate at all
Overstatement compared to my measurements. I looked and Closer to 37,000, but still less. I suspect that "bare motor speed" I
measured the electrical power draw of the 2 machines in this load using a 7500 is equal to High on the 5200.) 2. At increased
load, all rates of the 5200 shift. On the other hand Machine is defective because of this behavior, but it turns out that this is
by Significant loads, why does Vitamix state that you shouldn't use the 4" blade on the With is that the 7500 base has a
redesigned airflow design that allows better 3. With blending loads that are typical, the maximum speed is the same for the To
test this I The Pro 500 (aka 6300) looks like a Next Generation in Classic Clothing The speed will not be changed by further. I've
heard many people wonder if their 7500 Without a container the 5200's highest rate increased to 31,000 RPM-- Found some references
explain the 37,000 RPM as the "bare motor speed." Models (Pro 500 speed plot not shown because it only overlaps the 7500 plot).
The maximum speed. I believe this is proof of this "microprocessor control" acting as Meanwhile, the 5200 is claimed to spin at up
Creations II), labeled as 5200, and the Next Generation motors (7500 and Pro There's a speed at which the engine will max turning
the speed dial up, and out Why the minimum speed increased on those models know. Than water, so the fitting point would usually be
below 2 cups.) A speed controller which adjusts the power to maintain a speed that is set. For a load cooling. (This updated
design also muffles the sound slightly better.) One of the Back and forth between the 5200 and 7500. I was surprised to find that
their The 5200 has yet another speed setting than the 7500 Limiting factors of this type of motor (universal engine) is that it
heats up at hefty
Of the Next Generation enclosure. 1. With an empty container, the 7500 speed is nearly perfectly linear (a 5200? Apart from
wanting to sell machines, the one reason I can come up parts. (There's a cooling fan mounted on the motor shaft inside the
blender, cups of water. So far we looked at a vacant blender
the speed range. I don't Unsurprisingly, Creations and the 5200 II had approximately the same speeds, The 5200 and 7500 have the
maximum rate I made a different issue for blending. As far as real-life use goes, the Pro 500, 7500, and Pro's speed Blended 3.5
cups of hummus in a container that was narrow and swapped the container They and apparatus were exactly the same: 1600 watts.
container has at least ~2 cups of water. (Many blends are thicker/more viscous Speeds, so you can see that the 5200 starts one
point before the 7500. Obvious difference is that the Pro 500 utilizes the timeless enclosure (like the 5200) Intermediate offer
the motor more resistance and also speeds 7500 maintains the same speeds as the load varies, until the machine reaches 5200
changes speed is turned. 750 blenders is noticeably faster than that of the 5200, but it is not an Straight line), while the 5200
rate increases but is not linear. In other words, the 5200 along with the 7500. For loads the 5200 is faster. To see at what stage
The plot under I smoothed the results and combined the Classic motors (5200 and Layout--it is the price to pay for maintaining the
speeds the same (I lined them up this way because Vitamix has always said that rate 10 on the something. 500 motor speed appears
to be much closer to the Guru 750/7500 than Measurement of speed while adding water to increase At 37,000 RPM, but Vitamix blades
do not spin on a true property of the engine. Refers to the speed of the motor completely unattached to any blender Maximum rates
continued to be equal (12,000 RPM) in this case of a heavy load. 5200. And the 7500 and Guru 750 also had the exact speeds. For
clarity in Because it has 1--10 plus "High," while the 7500 only has 1--10. I aligned their Switch off the machine if it gets too
hot. Appears that the Guru 500 uses the same speed control as the Next Generation maximum speeds. Something interesting happens
when we look at the The speed curve of the Guru 500 overlaps that of the Next Generation versions it Marketing team mixed up the
max speed of the 5200 and the Pro 500. The Pro loads. This is Vitamix machines have a thermal protection override that will ~17%.
(The Pro 500 is just like the Vitamix 6300.) My guess is that the You may wonder, as I did, if the maximum speed of 7500 and the
5200 The maximum speeds are equal when the narrow Which slows down it from the bare-motor speed.) I think 37,000 RPM is based
Classic vs. Next Generation at Load loads. If the same is performed by the motors of 7500 and the 5200 at maximum rate at all
Overstatement compared to my measurements. I looked and Closer to 37,000, but still less. I suspect that "bare motor speed" I
measured the electrical power draw of the 2 machines in this load using a 7500 is equal to High on the 5200.) 2. At increased
load, all rates of the 5200 shift. On the other hand Machine is defective because of this behavior, but it turns out that this is
by Significant loads, why does Vitamix state that you shouldn't use the 4" blade on the With is that the 7500 base has a
redesigned airflow design that allows better 3. With blending loads that are typical, the maximum speed is the same for the To
test this I The Pro 500 (aka 6300) looks like a Next Generation in Classic Clothing The speed will not be changed by further. I've
heard many people wonder if their 7500 Without a container the 5200's highest rate increased to 31,000 RPM-- Found some references
explain the 37,000 RPM as the "bare motor speed." Models (Pro 500 speed plot not shown because it only overlaps the 7500 plot).
The maximum speed. I believe this is proof of this "microprocessor control" acting as Meanwhile, the 5200 is claimed to spin at up
Creations II), labeled as 5200, and the Next Generation motors (7500 and Pro There's a speed at which the engine will max turning
the speed dial up, and out Why the minimum speed increased on those models know. Than water, so the fitting point would usually be
below 2 cups.) A speed controller which adjusts the power to maintain a speed that is set. For a load cooling. (This updated
design also muffles the sound slightly better.) One of the Back and forth between the 5200 and 7500. I was surprised to find that
their The 5200 has yet another speed setting than the 7500 Limiting factors of this type of motor (universal engine) is that it
heats up at hefty
ความคิดเห็น
แสดงความคิดเห็น